Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?

To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
From: Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:45:40 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] 20230716141540.hkv4sqawnjfmtm3x@office.mailbox.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ZLPz7mQgYGDFQmei@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] 1858418335.117064.1689490424873@office.mailbox.org> <[🔎] ZLPz7mQgYGDFQmei@an3as.eu>

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 03:43:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > (Combining these into one would likely fix the bug as well)
> 
> Feel free to fix it.

This was indeed the fix. I've merged B-D with B-D-I and uploaded.

> > [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/07/msg00188.html 

Best,
Nilesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
  - From: Nilesh Patra <nilesh@mailbox.org>
- Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
Next by Date: Re: [Help] Could someone please have a look at gmap build failure
Previous by thread: Re: What is the point of B-D-I in a package that has no arch:any component?
Next by thread: Re: Bug#1040566: let logol be removed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread