[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sigrok RFSs



Dear Andreas,

On 03/14/2017 12:06 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Zoltan,
>
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 03:32:42AM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote:
>> Dear Mentors,
>>
>> at the beggining of the last week i submitted a couple of RFSs[1]
>> regarding to the packages related to the sigrok[2] suite and its updates
>> since the last version released to Debian.
>>  I'll be the first to admit that it's rather big pile of stuff to review
>> (we are talking about 6 source packages, also with soname upgrades and
>> so on), and i also know that most of the DD community is busy with
>> Stretch related tasks, but even then:
>>  what else (beside uploading the updated packages and file the RFSs) can
>> i do to ease the reviewing work and mainly to find a sponsor to provide
>> the certainly needed guidence?
> As far as I can see sigrok fits nicely into the Debian Science scope
> and thus I'd recommend maintaining the packages in this team and sending
> the RFPs on the relevant mailing list might make the right noise at the
> right place.
>
> If you are willing to understand the Debian Science tasks framework I
> can offer Sponsering of Blends[3].
>
> Hope this helps
>
>        Andreas.
>
>  
>> [1]
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856974
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856981
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856987
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856989
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857002
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857004
>>
>> [2] http://sigrok.org/
> [3] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB
>
>
 Sounds good, thanks for the response!
 In the next days i'm going to read through the corresponding docs and
subscribe/check out the mailing list, and I'll contact you with my
questions regarding to the next steps.

Thanks, regards

Zoltan Gyarmati
https://zgyarmati.de


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: