* Mike Miller <mtmiller@debian.org> [2019-10-01 14:34]:
Maybe instead of a dependency on a specific liboctaveN, we could have dh-octave inject dependencies on "octave (>= 5.1~), octave (<< 6)"? This is essentially the stability promise we are aiming to provide now upstream.
Would this be enough? What will happen if, in the 5.2 release, the soname is bumped from liboctave7 to liboctave8?
Rafael