[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Octave 9 transition



Le lundi 12 février 2024 à 19:07 +0100, Rafael Laboissière a écrit :
> * Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org> [2024-02-10 09:32]:
> 
> > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2024-02-09 21:20]:
> > 
> > > I have uploaded octave 9.0.90 to experimental.
> > > 
> > > The next step is to try to rebuild all packages against octave 9 
> > > (both those within and outside the DOG), and file bugs accordingly 
> > > (in Debian and if needed upstream), or upload fixes if they are 
> > > already available.
> > 
> > I launched a batch for building the Octave-related packages against 
> > Octave 9. Let us see how it does.
> 
> So far, I have detected problems only in octave-sparsersb and 
> octave-level-set. These are now fixed on unstable. There may be other 
> packages that FTBFS against octave v9. We will see.

Thanks for that!

> I also noticed that Octave 9 breaks SWIG. This would also cause FTBFS for 
> the plplot package. I proposed a patch upstream: 
> https://github.com/swig/swig/pull/2799

Could you possibly open a bug against the Debian package, linking to
the upstream bug report?

Best,

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  https://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: