Am Montag, den 05.09.2016, 16:28 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > [ becomes *a bit* offtopic regarding your bug, but... ] Indeed, sorry. To summarize, I think by now this bug is about (1) extending the description of the libreoffice meta-package to mention that additional packages are installed in order to match an upstream Libreoffice installation as closely as possible and (2) considering fonts-croscore as an alternative dependency to fonts-liberation. > Hmm? I don't get that. Liberation is the replacement for Arial etc, > ttbomk. fonts-croscore is Google's variant of Red Hat's fonts-liberation. It provides wider glyph coverage under a "better" license (i.e. SIL OFL), but lacks the Sans Narrow variant and has Liberation's carfully crafted hinting replaced by some auto-hinting. Fedora maintains this font under the Liberation v2 name, but has currently reverted back to using the Liberation v1 fonts again because of the hinting issues. Anyway, the fonts in fonts-croscore fit well visually with the ones in fonts-crosextra-*, so I think it should be possible to replace fonts- liberation for the former. Maybe this is also something that should be brought to consideration upstream. > Well, upstreams "deb"-download? :) Wow, thanks for this massive list of packages. What I was actually going to ask for, though, was a line somewhere in the build scripts that has all the fonts listed that will go into a standard upstream install. But I guess you already provided that in the last paragraph, so thank you! ;) Cheers, Fabian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part