Re: Maybe it's time to split debian-devel-changes
Hi,
>>"Wichert" == Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@wiggy.ml.org> writes:
Wichert> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
Wichert> Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
>> In the meantime, I think we should start thinking about the splitting of
>> debian-devel-changes, creating lists for every architecture (we have
>> already seven).
Wichert> What is wrong with using procmail for that?
I use POP. Procmail runs on my machine. It is too late by that
time, since I have already downloaded the message. If I do not
subscribe to one of the lists, those messages never bog down the thin
pipe to my machine.
*That* is what is wrong with using procmail (apart from the fact
that it is seriously under powered for the task ;-)
manoj
--
'Tis not in mortals to command success; But we'll do more,
Sempronius--we'll deserve it. -- Addison
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: