Re: changes and standards documents
Hi,
>>"Jules" == Jules Bean <jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk> writes:
Jules> I agree with Phil here.
The only reason Phil had was sanctity of main.
Jules> I vote for maintaining the 'sanctity' of main. The only
Jules> exceptions
Exceptions? There is no such thing as almost pregnant. If
there are exceptions, you can make an exception for standards
too. (You wanna throw out the FSSTND too, since it is not DFSG free?)
Jules> that I personally would grant are: 1) legal
Jules> licenses (e.g. the GPL itself) and 2) short, relevant personal
Jules> communications (such as when we stick an email from the
Jules> upstream maintainer in /usr/doc because it explains some point
Jules> of contention).
Why? What harm dos the community suffer from Debian
distributing the FSSTND?
manoj
--
There seems no plan because it is all plan. C.S. Lewis
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: