Re: Maybe it's time to split debian-devel-changes
Hi,
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
Santiago> * People subscribed to the first one are only interested in
Santiago> binary .deb packages for the i386 architecture, not in
Santiago> new source packages. Most of the Debian users currently
Santiago> subscribed to debian-devel-changes will want to stay here.
I think you may be mistaken. I am on the list because I want
to see new packages, (source changes); not because I am necesarily
interested in i386 packages.
Santiago> I think we should not force normal i386 users to receive source
Santiago> announcements not containing any i386 .deb binary.
So why is it OK to force non-i386 people to recieve i386
notices? This does seem i386 centric.
I suggest remaning this to -sources; and then evryone who is
interested in a particular arch can join that list.
manoj
--
Success is the result of behavior that completely contradicts the
usual expectations about the behavior of a successful person. --
Felix R. Paturi
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: