Re: /usr/X11R6

To: Branden Robinson <branden@purdue.edu>, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /usr/X11R6
From: Andreas Jellinghaus <aj@dungeon.inka.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 18:40:30 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980828184030.A6605@dungeon.inka.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980828045040.B2415@purdue.edu>; from Branden Robinson on Fri, Aug 28, 1998 at 04:50:40AM -0400
References: <[🔎] 87u32xu7s1.fsf@fleming.jimpick.com> <[🔎] 19980828045040.B2415@purdue.edu>

> Wouldn't bother me if we whacked /usr/X11R6 altogether and just moved all
> its stuff into the FHS-compliant places, and left behind the appropriate
> symlinks.
> 
> I have no idea if/how this would break existing stuff, though.

i see no reason not why it should not work. the dirs under X11R6 prefectly
integrate into /usr. and this solves problems like what to do with share and
libexec (X11R6/share or share/X11 ? X11R6/libexec or libexec/X11 ?).

two share tree's doesn't make sence to me..

andreas

Reply to:

References:
- /usr/X11R6
  - From: Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com>
- Re: /usr/X11R6
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@purdue.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: /usr/X11R6
Next by Date: Re: /usr/X11R6
Previous by thread: Re: /usr/X11R6
Next by thread: Re: /usr/X11R6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread