On 08-Jan-99 Jules Bean wrote: > Of course, they might not want to be a debian developer. > > Note that, currently, to be a debian developer you have to agree with the > DFSG. Commercial developers might well not.. > > Perhaps we could afford them a quasi-developer status. Alternatively, > they could easily use our support infrastructure (the mailing lists, > -mentors in particular) without being developers. Although, presumably we > need their key in the keyring for them to make uploads.. If it's included on the distribution (or even in the non-free tree), there should probably be a Debian Maintianer responsible.. either a current maintainer engaged by the company or an employee of their own who becomes a maintainer with all that it implies (Social Contract/DFSG/etc). -- ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <>< * * -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------* * Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 * * <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++* * KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- * * Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ * * <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ * * -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------* =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpIsUl9f1QhZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature