[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#459868: debian-policy: Definition of Maintainer: when using a mailing list



On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 08:02:43AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > +	  If the maintainer of a package no longer has time or desire to
> > +	  maintain a package, it will be orphaned according to the
> > +	  procedure described in the Debian Developer's Reference
> > +	  (see <ref id="related">).  The maintainer then

> "It will" makes it sound like that the former maintainer has nothing to
> do. "It should" would be more appropriate IMO.

But "should" is a magic, normative verb in policy, so I avoided using it
here even though it's the natural choice... :)

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: