Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?

To: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>, Debian Developers <debian-project@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 16:44:15 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 19991129164415.A22480@polya>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87zovy2kiq.fsf@mrvnbook.intern.lin4net.de>; from goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de on Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 01:45:17AM +0100
References: <[🔎] 14397.45475.295882.776905@bylbo.nowhere.earth> <[🔎] 87zovy2kiq.fsf@mrvnbook.intern.lin4net.de>

On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 01:45:17AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Just some examples: Why are devscripts in util and not in devel? Aren´t
> they for developement?

devscripts (2.1.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Moved package from utils to devel (closes: #33410)

 -- Julian Gilbey <jdg@debian.org>  Sun, 21 Feb 1999 00:52:26 +0000

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg

Reply to:

References:
- Getting rid of section "base" ?
  - From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
- Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?
  - From: Goswin Brederlow <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed change to Debian constitution
Next by Date: Interfaces (was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Previous by thread: Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?
Next by thread: Interfaces (was: Getting rid of section "base" ?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread