Re: on keep providing python 2 packages
On Aug 19, 2016, at 08:19 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>I got a feeling we are somehow discouraging the introduction of
>python2 package in unstable (it was also discussed at the BoF).
Hi Sandro,
Just to clarify my own opinion, for *libraries* which upstream supports both
Python 2 and Python 3, we should provide both in Debian. It's also easy, so
why not? :)
I think we should discourage libraries where upstream only provides Python 2
versions, by trying to find bilingual alternatives. Sometimes this is
unavoidable though.
For *applications* which support both Python 2 and 3, we want to install them
only as Python 3 applications, unless there's some overriding reason why we
need to provide them for both. That gets into the ugly `nose2-3` situation,
so let's really try to avoid that, and encourage `$python -m` style invocation
where possible.
Now let's talk about libraries for PyPy and Jython. :)
Cheers,
-Barry
Reply to: