[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: filecheck



Hi!

Uploaded! Thanks for you contribution to Debian :-)

Cheers,
Emmanuel

On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 11:24:20PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 5:27 AM Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 05:03:45PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Thanks for reviewing my package!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:51 AM Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@yaerobi.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:46:36PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:34:43PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> > > > > > Hi team!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking help
> > > > > > to review/upload my new python package:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TIA.
> > > > > To avoid duplicated work from another team member, I mention here, I'm
> > > > > going to review this package.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Emmanuel
> > > >
> > > > Hi!,
> > > >
> > > > Me again.
> > > >
> > > > I leave you some comments regarding to FileCheck
> > > >
> > > > * Binary package suggests install the docs package, but is not in
> > > >   d/control.
> > > Done. Here the ideal situation should be a docs package on there, but if we use
> > > sphinx-build to build its doc, there is one guzzle_sphinx_theme does
> > > not in Debian.
> > > So I package its manpage to binary package.
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > >
> > > > * Package should depends on python3-poetry-core instead of python3-poetry
> > > Done.
> > >
> > > > * d/copyright: upstream does not specify a range of date 2019-2023, only in
> > > >   docs/conf.py the copyright says 2019.
> > > Yeah, although there are only one file flaged its date on 2019, but
> > > how to judge the
> > > whole project copyright date range? I just follow its the first commit:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/mull-project/FileCheck.py/commits/main?after=195aa1527a2572b4697ae0d5c604f0baceba805c+419&branch=main&qualified_name=refs%2Fheads%2Fmain
> > >
> > > Not sure this is right.
> >
> > I'd just use 2019, not a range.
> 
> Ok, done.
> >
> > >
> > > > * The package synopsis should not finished with a period. Please remove it.
> > > Sorry, I am not very clear about here. Do you mean here:
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L30
> > > If yes, I think the synopsis solution should be more robust here.
> > > Because it saves more space than
> > > specially descriptions.
> > >
> > > please let me know if there is not true.
> >
> > Sorry, perhaps I was not clear, I mean remove the period at the end of
> > line 20 [0].
> 
> Okay, done. :)
> >
> > >
> > > > * The binary package should not be python3-filecheck?
> > > You hint me here. So I spilted the origin package into python3 library
> > > package and
> > > its binary tool binary. this should be working.
> > >
> > > I have updated the package on salsa:
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck
> > >
> > > Thanks again for reviewing the package!
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Bo
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Emmanuel
> > > > > >
> > > > > > BR,
> > > > > > Bo
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > The rest looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks.
> I updated the package here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/tree/debian/main/debian
> 
> Thanks,
> BR,
> Bo
> >
> > [0] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L20

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: