Re: latte-dock_0.7.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 08:28:34AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> El viernes, 4 de enero de 2019 07:10:09 -03 Bastian Blank escribió:
> > Please don't re-use versions.
> I understand that by: "if you uploaded 1.2.3-1 don't reupload 1.2.3-1, bu
> better 1.2.3-2" Is that right? If it is: what's the problem? The package has
> never reached the archive, so it virtually never existed. Except some tool
> requires it :-/
We index our notes on packages by name+version, but we don't keep a full
history. So while cleaning up my own notes I found a matching package
and only a deep look showed that this is not longer the same.
> > po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause,
> > so "LGPL-2.1+ or LGPL-3+" is incorrect.
> Fair, but does it *really* deserves a reject? The license is still dfsg
> compliant and there is only one tiny little fix which can be fixed on the next
> upload. An accept + RC bug could also work here.
For attributions we now tend to do that, but not for listing too broad
licenses.
Regards,
Bastian
--
Respect is a rational process
-- McCoy, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
Reply to: