Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6)
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 04:40:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Where's a reason for the difference between the priorities `optional'
> > and `extra' if you can't be sure that a CD
> > excluding all `extra' packages but including all others gives you a Debian
> > with no missing dependencies?
>
> The primary reason for priorities was to help people decide which packages
> they want. If you want to create custom CDs with special properties, feel
> free. If you notice that it doesn't really work with potato, feel free
> to fix it in woody.
Questions: What's the reason this has not been fixed in potato during
the last months? What do you plan to do to release woody having a sane
override file which fulfills policy requirements about priorities?
Thanks.
Reply to: