[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fixing the eel2 madness



On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:14:04AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:39:47AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le mercredi 28 février 2007 à 19:21 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> >>> As 2.14.3-3 is now in testing, I've uploaded 2.14.3-4 to unstable with
> >>> the same changes as 2.16-3-2. It is currently sitting in NEW.
> >> It is now out of NEW - kudos to the ftpmaster who fast-tracked it - and
> >> built on all architectures.

> >> Could you please schedule binNMUs of nautilus-cd-burner, nautilus,
> >> music-applet, mail-notification, link-monitor-applet and gnome-mount?
> > Scheduled, along with binNMUs for nautilus-python.

> All of these bin-NMUs were done now, so eel2 should be ready to
> transition to testing. There is a problem though:

> mail-notification | 3.0.dfsg.1-10 |       testing | source, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> mail-notification | 4.0~rc2.dfsg.1-4 |      unstable | source
> mail-notification | 4.0~rc2.dfsg.1-4+b1 |      unstable | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

> The mail-notification bin-NMU was done on the base of a source version
> not targetted at testing. So I guess the right thing now is to force in
> the new eel2 (together with nautilus-cd-burner, nautilus, music-applet,
> link-monitor-applet, gnome-mount and nautilus-python) and then schedule
> bin-NMUs for the then broken mail-notification in testing. Steve?

Yep.  Hints added on eel2 now, to confirm that this is really the only thing
missing; if so, I'll force-hint it and schedule binNMUs.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: