On 16-05-11 09:53:06, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > The only mistake I could find by looking at the source is in > `debian/copyright`: > > “MIT” is an ambiguous term for the licence, see > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License#Various_versions>. > The term most often refers to the Expat license: > <http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt> Thanks, wasn't aware of this. > Could you check and specify “Expat” if it's the case? Well, actually I've just took the license the upstream author provided [1]. Should I clarify this with him? > Have you tried to run autopkgtest for the package? I know it's one > more thing to setup, but it's now fairly easy and you won't regret it. > Uploading a package that breaks stuff is not a fun experience. I didn't set up autopkgtest, because I disabled the tests. This decision was not an easy one, because it felt quite 'hakish'; I've spent something like four hours to try to find a way to make this work. I ran the tests manually, in an environment with only gpg1 installed, and all passed. In the end, I've decided to disable test test _for now_, and planned to re-enable these "soon". But yes, maybe you're right, to fix these first, and upload afterwards. Thanks for your input Lunar! Cheers, Georg [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-mail-gpg.git/tree/LICENSE.txt?h=upstream#n3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature