Re: 64bits & df
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:54:58PM -0600, Otto Solares wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:30:22PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:18:51 -0600
> > Otto Solares <solca@guug.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hopefully glibc's statfs64 does not depend on kernel 2.4.
> >
> > The statfs64 system call only exists in 2.6.x kernels that is
> > why 2.4.x returns -ENOSYS and then glibc downgrades to use the
> > older statfs system call instead.
>
> Thank you. Hopefully Ben will find a solution, weird he does
> not have the same problem using 2.6 and latest sid's glibc.
I just upgraded glibc to the latest (been a week since I did), and now I
get your problem.
I'm starting to worry that sparc libc6 builds have fallen out the shit
hole while I wasn't looking. Someone's uploaded a new kernel headers
package that is now being used by glibc, and the sparc headers are now
from 2.6.0-test7. I'm wondering if those headers are broken...
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Reply to: