Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?

To: "James D. Freels" <fea@fea.rrd.ornl.gov>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?
From: Stefan Baums <sbaums@stud.uni-goettingen.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 17:36:38 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] m0wsrql-000f6xC@deepthought.mynet>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 28 Jul 1997 09:59:07 EDT." <[🔎] m0wsqKJ-000Jn3C@fea.rrd.ornl.gov>

> SCO emulation.  Perhaps there are other stories of Ibcs2 or other 
> 2.0.30 failures the Debian users would like to share?

# insmod msdos
/lib/modules/2.0.30/fs/msdos.o: unresolved symbol fat_get_entry_R1dbb54c9
...
[plus about twenty other "unresolved symbol" errors]

Greetings,
Stefan
-- 
Stefan Baums
Universitaet Goettingen
mailto:sbaums@stud.uni-goettingen.de

Attachment: pgpZyyoPJjcfj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?
  - From: Alexander Koch <efraim@argh.org>
- Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?
  - From: Dima <dima@eris.dev.null>

References:
- Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?
  - From: "James D. Freels" <fea@fea.rrd.ornl.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: xdm configuration
Next by Date: Re: xdm configuration
Previous by thread: Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?
Next by thread: Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread