On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:41:39AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > > Also, in the defense of the US and British intelligence agencies it isn't > like Saddam didn't give them a reason to think he was currently in possession > of WMD. He was playing a delicate balancing act. On the one hand he was > telling the West that he didn't have them while playing like he did to keep > the other regimes that were eying Iraq at bay. It turns out we in the West > believed him at his games. The simple fact is the price of acting on those > suspicions and being wrong (there were no WMD) was far less costly than > ignoring them and finding out they were true (there were WMD). > This is why there is all this revisionism going on in the media and on the left. They hate feeling like they got played. Saddam played the whole world. He got what he deserved. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature