> You'll need to figure out how to build the vulkan dlls from source > using winegcc or mingw. Would it be shipped in the vulkan source package or should that be a new source package? On 2018-10-18 10:58 p.m., Michael Gilbert wrote: > Again, I consider what upstream does to be wrong since it will > interfere with using the default behavior of the wine-development > package standalone. So what would be the way to use dxvk if it is not installed inside the prefix? > so please make sure dxvk either uses a separate prefix How would that work? The scripts provided by upsteam will install dxvk to any prefix. Would you suggest that I hardcode a prefix path that doesn't honor WINEPREFIX or that asks for confirmation? >> Finally, should I maintain dxvk as part of the wine team? > > Yes, you can add this to the team maintained packages. Okay, I have sent a request to join the team on salsa! Cheers, -- Alexandre Viau aviau@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature