On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 02:41:18AM +0200, David Madore wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 05:25:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The obvious > > workaround here would be to not list apt sources in your configuration that > > you don't actually want apt to use... > So I guess my bug report wasn't clean enough on what is required: the > sources should be used (for example for packages which are newer on > these sources), but with lower priority than the sources on the local > drive. As in previous versions of apt, that is. No, that's clear; I just don't consider this release critical. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature