Re: debian boot floppies almost ready ...

[Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>]

On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 10:28:30PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 08:25:08PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > it's just a scanf to a buffer then a strcpy of the buffer that is sent back. I
> > did it in a hurry, but it should be easy to fix i think ...
> I think I found it. atonum does not work in the -bf version, I replaced it
> with atoi and it works fine AFAICS. What is atonum anyway, I did not find it
> in my C books. Is there any difference to atoi? Where is atonum defined?
> (I am just curious, some computer scientist around to explain?).

Well, i did not find also atonum in /usr/include, but then i maybe have not
all here.

Lets just do the change like you suggested, it should work fine, ...

> I propose to replace all atonum calls in the amiga-fdisk source by atoi. 
> Comments? I can build a package on kullervo tomorrow.

Yes, please build it, i think one of us should take over the amiga-fdisk
package (maybe it should be you, my apus box is on the dying side, ... :((()

We should ask frank to officially orphan it then, ...

send me notice when it hits incoming, so that i will build the ppc version.

another thing, should be make it architecture any (for woody), since with the
new 2.3/2.4 kernels have support for amiga partitioning scheme, even under
i386 and other architecture, ...

Friendly,

Sven LUTHER