Re: Developer locations (was: Another Key signing request)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Developer locations (was: Another Key signing request)
From: Chad Miller <cmiller@surfsouth.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 18:27:21 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000518182721.B13707@surfsouth.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000518161007.28194B-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
References: <[🔎] BPEMKIDLIGOACNCNPMJJAEBFCBAA.chris@printf.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000518161007.28194B-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>

On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 04:11:54PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>                                           [....] Of the [long., lat.]
> data entered it should be good to at least an airport, some is better,
> some is worse.

Grep Google for 'geocoding'.  hth			- chad

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Developer locations (was: Another Key signing request)
  - From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>

References:
- Developer locations (was: Another Key signing request)
  - From: "Chris Ball" <chris@printf.net>
- Re: Developer locations (was: Another Key signing request)
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Is this a bug in gpg, mutt, or what?
Next by Date: Re: ITP: Nautilus
Previous by thread: Re: Developer locations (was: Another Key signing request)
Next by thread: Re: Developer locations (was: Another Key signing request)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread