Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org> writes:
> The Debian project is now *required* by the DFSG to *package* and
> *distribute* non-free software? (As opposed to, say, allowing people
Not at all. In our *social Contract* (not the DFSG), we state that our
users may well wish to use non-free software, and that although it
isn't part of Debian we will provide the support and infrastructure
for those of our users who wish to use it.
Matthew
--
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org
Reply to: