Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:09:37AM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> Are we allowed to remove things in main which are only used by
> non-free, and are no longer useful outside that context?
Free Software are not prohibited to be used for comercial or non-free
use or private use. This Free Software being a library, old or not doesn't
matter.
It's free software, it has been packaged, and is currently in
debian. Why would you want to remove it?
--
Fabrice Gautier
gautier@email.enst.fr
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Adam Rogoyski <rogoyski@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)