[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Why the GR is not necessary
To
: Jim Lynch <
jim@laney.edu
>
Cc
:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: Why the GR is not necessary
From
:
tb@MIT.EDU
(Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date
: 09 Jun 2000 03:21:57 -0400
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
u1hzoovuxnu.fsf@pusey.mit.edu
>
In-reply-to
: Jim Lynch's message of "Thu, 08 Jun 2000 23:52:23 -0700"
References
: <
[🔎]
20000608161615.I24599@server1
> <
[🔎]
Pine.LNX.4.21.0006082154001.5809-100000@hognose.cs.utexas.edu
> <
[🔎]
20000608231546.D26303@server1
> <
[🔎]
20000609144856.O10942@taz.net.au
> <
[🔎]
u1haegvwi84.fsf@pusey.mit.edu
> <
[🔎]
20000608221921.K453@perlsupport.com
> <
[🔎]
u1h7lbzwh8n.fsf@pusey.mit.edu
> <
[🔎]
200006090652.XAA28037@earth.laney.edu
>
I would be very happy with Jim Lynch's proposal. It seems like a good compromise between both sides.
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Thomas Bushnell, BSG (on-list)
Thomas Bushnell, BSG (off-list)
References
:
Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
From:
Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
From:
Adam Rogoyski <rogoyski@cs.utexas.edu>
Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
From:
Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
From:
Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
From:
tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Why the GR is not necessary
From:
Chip Salzenberg <chip@valinux.com>
Re: Why the GR is not necessary
From:
tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Re: Why the GR is not necessary
From:
Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>
Prev by Date:
Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
Next by Date:
Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
Previous by thread:
Re: Why the GR is not necessary
Next by thread:
Re: Why the GR is not necessary
Index(es):
Date
Thread