Re: Removing non-free - reality check.
- To: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: Benedikt Eric Heinen <beh@icemark.ch>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@ns.snowman.net>, John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>, Ch.Troestler@linkline.be, kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Removing non-free - reality check.
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 08:17:45 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20000613081745.Y10942@taz.net.au>
- Mail-followup-to: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>, "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@MIT.EDU>, Benedikt Eric Heinen <beh@icemark.ch>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@ns.snowman.net>, John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>, Ch.Troestler@linkline.be, kgh12351@nifty.ne.jp, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] u1hr9a2iu46.fsf@x15-cruise-basselope.mit.edu>; from tb@MIT.EDU on Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 03:20:21PM -0400
- References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.05.10006102103360.24313-100000@ns.snowman.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0006110036300.2581-100000@fenun.icemark.ch> <[🔎] 20000611132942.P10942@taz.net.au> <[🔎] u1hitvfkebb.fsf@pusey.mit.edu> <[🔎] 20000612100157.R10942@taz.net.au> <[🔎] u1hg0qjkbms.fsf@pusey.mit.edu> <[🔎] 20000612112339.S10942@taz.net.au> <[🔎] u1hr9a3e6vf.fsf@mary-kay-commandos.mit.edu> <[🔎] 20000612195244.V10942@taz.net.au> <[🔎] u1hr9a2iu46.fsf@x15-cruise-basselope.mit.edu>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 03:20:21PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> writes:
>
> > > I am no longer interested in participating in your flames, so I will
> > > leave analysis of your other points to people who are still taking you
> > > seriously.
> >
> > in other words, your arguments (and i use the term very loosely) can't
> > stand up to vigorous questioning so you're going to run away and pretend
> > you can't hear any dissenting views.
>
> No, my arguments need criticsm and I've learned much of value from
> this discussion. Your posts however have not contributed anything of
> value to me and so I ignore them.
you're good at redefining words to suit your current position, so
i guess you define "value" as anything that supports your narrow,
blinkered viewpoint.
have a nice day.
craig
--
craig sanders
Reply to: