Re: KDE not in Debian?
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 10:57:37PM -0800, Nick Moffitt wrote:
> begin Joe Drew quotation:
> > That's one option; another, however, is that rms simply meant to
> > allow people to be saved the hassle of distributing the source to,
> > for example, libc, which is distributed with the OS.
> > It's not necessarily true - or even likely - but it's possible.
>
> This is what RMS has said to me in person.
Would this mean, then, that libraries linked against GPL'd programs must
be GPL'd, regardless of whether they are included with the OS or not?
Reply to: