Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:26:35 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000314122635.A27637@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000313201700.K18772@kitenet.net>
References: <[🔎] 20000312155341.A21977@molehole.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 20000313115047.D1215@3dlabs.com> <[🔎] 20000313145011.C23095@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] 20000313134346.A13704@3dlabs.com> <[🔎] 20000313153053.A23283@cibalia.gkvk.hr> <[🔎] 20000313201700.K18772@kitenet.net>

On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 08:17:00PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > But slink is practically completely adjusted for 2.2 already.
> 
> Sure, if you ignore the 12 packages that break
> (http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel-2.2)

I believe 12 out of ~2250 counts as "practically completely".

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!
  - From: Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
- The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
  - From: Paul M Sargent <pauls@3dlabs.com>
- Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
  - From: Paul M Sargent <pauls@3dlabs.com>
- Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
  - From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: (Re)build a Debian package
Next by Date: RE: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!
Previous by thread: Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
Next by thread: Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread