Re: ELM Copyright
rdm@test.legislate.com (Raul Miller) wrote on 10.10.97 in <[🔎] 19971010205510.06659@test.legislate.com>:
> Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > Note the words "reasonable copying fee", and "You may not charge a fee
> > for this Package itself". I consider this language equivalent to that
> > in the Elm license. If you reject Elm then you must also reject the
> > Artistic License, for the same reason.
>
> Elm doesn't allow for a reasonable copying fee. Or did I miss something?
I think so. Elm seems to allow for any copying fee you want, as long as
it's not specifically for Elm. That's the same the Artistic License says:
as long as it's not specifically for Perl, charge what you want. And
that's what the DFSG wants.
At least that's how I understand it.
MfG Kai
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: