Re: svgalibg1 | svgalibg-dummyg1 considered harmful
James Troup wrote:
> I agree it's not clean (I don't think it's desperately hard though,
> [except maybe for people who think debmake is the only way to package
> things]), but what's the alternative? The ludicrous situation where
> dpkg will happily allow you install a package which is functionally
> useless?
>
> And since it's only for 6 packages I think it should be done. (joeyh
> is the maintainer for 3 of those 6, and AIUI he is happy to do the
> requisite uncleanness)
I expect I will have to hack on the output of dpkg-shlibdeps with sed or
perl. I don't think it will be too big a deal to set up properly.
--
see shy jo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: