Re: intent to package TETware and VSX-PCTS from TOG
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> Without suggesting /opt/TET as the home for this package (something that
> even I don't really like) I am left with a selection from /usr. While I
> can see arguments for /usr/lib, /usr/share, and even /usr/src, I have no
> idea which is correct for this application. I am sure that there are some
> of you with a better opinion than myself. I hope you will share it ;-)
Why not /opt? Its established practice in UNIX and is part of the FHS
standard. All the other suggestions would not follow FHS.
--
Jean Pierre
Reply to: