Re: Postfix as default MTA?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:29:36 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>Instead of arguing for or against postfix you should just try it.
That is irrelevent.
>The whole discussions seems to be between those who tried postfix
>and would love to see it as THE default MTA and those who never
>ever tried postfix and arguing for status QUO ...
No, it appears to be between people who have never tried Exim and people
who have never tried Postfix. The whole arguement is centered around the
supposed security and speed of Postfix against Exim when there are no real
stats for either. So far, the biggest blunder for the Postfix camp has been
describing the configuration file of Postfix and all of the Exim people
reypling, "Yeah, that's Exim, so what's your point?"
>In the evolution of MTAs postfix and qmail are the next generation
>and we should switch over (Or are you still using MVS or CPM ? )
Then what do you call Exim? Chopped liver? Sheesh.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBN4DP63pf7K2LbpnFEQKWigCfabQ059wHKnJpncc7vmZgV74wOFQAnRik
kjiMjFsilHWDQQR6DU9zfVxR
=v0dJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: