Re: Intent package mule2 and custom-mule (Important for emacs (lisp) package maintainers)
>>>>> In article <[🔎] E11e9JF-0000Ry-00@nu.ike.tottori-u.ac.jp>,
>>>>> "TK" == Takao KAWAMURA <kawamura@debian.org> wrote...
TK> In message "Re: Intent package mule2 and custom-mule (Important for emacs (lisp) package maintainers)"
TK> on 99/10/21, Takuo KITAME <kitame@northeye.org> writes:
>> Well, in neer future, I will work for merge or mule4.deb if it needed.
>> But I'm going to upload mule2 for Debian at onece.
>> If work for merge or mule4.deb will done and if emacs19 removed from Debian
>> it will time to remove also mule2, I think.
>>
>> One more an advantage of emacs19 and mule2 is smaller install-size.
TK> Have you asked the maintainer of emacs19 to merge your
TK> patch? Is the forking unavoidable?
I DON'T think that merging Mule into emacs19 is better.
Mule2.3 is not full high-compatible with emacs19.
And merging is very hard because paches are too big.
We have no time to freeze.
I'll upload mule2 package soon.
Regards.
--
Takuo KITAME
kitame@northeye.org
Reply to: