debian-legal Mar 2000 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
[no subject] Re: 'impact' ttf license? [andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork] [Fwd: license for iozone] [GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where? Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license. Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license. Re: ARM release status Re: AT&T source code agreement AT&T source licence? Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence example of AT&T using free license. Examples for non-freeness (Was: Re: AT&T source licence?) Re: Free Documentation License GPL: collective works GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works" Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others Is this good enough for non-free? license for iozone License of Meschach Maelstrom Copyright Question real ksh available as sources Unidentified subject! vnterm3.3 Copyright What type of license for iozone ¿µ¾î,ÀÏ¾î »ýȰȸȭ ¹«·á mailing service ¾È³»!! The last update was on 09:25 GMT Sat May 11. There are 126 messages. Page 1 of 1.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc