debian-legal Mar 2000 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
[no subject]
Re: 'impact' ttf license?
[andrew@AmbrosiaSW.com: Re: Copyright of maelstrom artwork]
[Fwd: license for iozone]
[GPL] No linking with proprietary programs: where?
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.
Re: An advise how to apply for the TkMan author to change his license.
Re: ARM release status
Re: AT&T source code agreement
AT&T source licence?
Copyright problem with new maelstrom licence
example of AT&T using free license.
Examples for non-freeness (Was: Re: AT&T source licence?)
Re: Free Documentation License
GPL: collective works
GPL: meaning of "independent and separate works"
Re: GPLv3 suggestion to solve KDE/QT problem and others
Is this good enough for non-free?
license for iozone
License of Meschach
Maelstrom Copyright
Question
real ksh available as sources
Unidentified subject!
vnterm3.3 Copyright
What type of license for iozone
¿µ¾î,ÀÏ¾î »ýÈ°È¸È ¹«·á mailing service ¾È³»!!
The last update was on 09:25 GMT Sat May 11. There are 126 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc