Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > OK, but then we have a problem: gem2deb currently generates source > packages named like the gem. This might be OK as a default, but I think > that we should have an option to switch to ruby-* source naming. > Anyone willing to make the changes? Actually it generates source packages with the same as the gem, and binary packages named like ruby-* by default. I've fixed that and sent you a pull request: https://github.com/ln/gem2deb/pull/13 > In the meantime, I will make a first upload of the gem2deb package to > Debian experimental. The other changes (installation of gemspec ; ruby-* > source name) can wait for the next upload. > > I'll post the link of the wiki page to -devel@ shortly, too. > > I think that the plan could be: > - upload gem2deb to experimental > - upload updated interpreter packages to experimental > - update a dozen of libs to use gem2deb, upload to experimental > If everything is fine at this point, move everything to unstable. > > Comments? Just one thing: since there is no previous version of gem2deb in unstable, I don't see the point of uploading it to experimental first. -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@softwarelivre.org> http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature