Re: alt->meta->esc status quo
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 09:41:25PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > Do you mean the first or the second solution? I can only speak for the
> > first, which works perfectly here and which is _a_ solution according to
> > Thomas Dickey.
>
> I meant the second one. If the first one is a working solution, can't
> it (or anonther solution) be integrated in the package?
It's not always the desired solution. Some keyboards _do_ have separate
META keys and always binding meta to alt would be very rude. The same goes
for binding escape to meta.
> works with mutt, slrn, ... , however. Although I know the question has
> been asked several times, and the answer has probably already been
> given, I couldn't find it... What's the "right" way to deal with that?
I have no idea. I'm a ctrl-a ctrl-e kind of guy. :)
--
charl p. botha | computer graphics and cad/cam
http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/
Reply to: