Re: My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 12:33:53AM -0700, Jim Lynch wrote:
> Try to convince people that I should be ousted because I demand the
> freedom to refuse to support non-free software and be vocal in so
> doing. To reiterate, I do so refuse.
WTF?
nobody ever asked you to. nobody is trying to force you to.
you can package and support whatever you want, nothing more and nothing
less.
> For the record, I hereby disclaim any promise whatsoever to support
> non-free software in any way whatsoever.
fine.
craig
--
craig sanders
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Adam Rogoyski <rogoyski@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Fabrice Gautier <gautier@email.enst.fr>
- My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
- From: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>