Re: An alternative to deb-make Re: deb-make
Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Thus, my utility, and I think common sense, dictates a simple
> structure:
>
> debian/
> package1/
> package1-dev/
> package-bin/
>
> Files common to all outputs, including rules, control and no doubt
> others that I don't remember, all sit in the /debian directory.
>
> Other files, including conffiles, shlibs, etc, are put in the
> subdirectory corresponding to the name of the deb file for which they
> are intended.
If you mean that the conffiles etc. are to be placed in those
subdirectories in the Debian source packages that I am afraid that that
is against the standard. See the mailing list archives for discussions
on this issue. That was the reason debmake had to put those files in
the /debian directory instead.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 1.2 is out! { http://www.debian.org/ }
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>
{ http://greathan.apana.org.au/~herbert/ }
PGP Key: pgp-public-keys@pgp.mit.edu or any other key sites
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: