Re: It's now DFSG compliant? I think yes but...
Federico Di Gregorio writes:
> I think this will suffice to put noweb in main, but... can someone
> double check that, please?
Looks ok to me.
And quotes:
> All rights reserved.
This is nonsensical, but harmless.
> Noweb is protected by copyright.
Yes, of course it is. Everything "fixed into tangible form" is
"protected". Copyright is compulsory.
> ...it is not protected by a ``copyleft'' agreement like the one used by
> the Free Software Foundation.
Actually his license is very like the GPL, but not as well designed. He
should just put it under the GPL and add his special conditions.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: