Re: Why "daemon" is not like "deity"
Hi,
>>"bruce" == bruce <bruce@va.debian.org> writes:
>> Herding cats, Bruce. You can't lead us where we do not wish to go.
bruce> Rest assured, the developers don't want to show religious
bruce> intolerance if they can avoid it by changing a single word.
But is it religous intolerance? So far, I have just seen your
word on that. Is anyone's religious sensibility actually hurt?
bruce> I can guide the group where a few people don't want to go, no
bruce> problem.
Are you sure it is just a few people in this case? I know it
is possible, but in the case of Purity, there were not (just a few, I
mean). I think it is controversioal enough that maybe we need a poll?
This is getting silly. I think you are making an error of
judgment here, but I have ceased to care.
I still think the person who wrote Deity is the only one who
gets to decide what it is called.
manoj
Who just does not have enough arrogance to suppose that he
Speaks With The Voice Of The People (TM)
--
When a man is resolute and recollected, pure of deed and persevering,
when he is attentive and self-controlled and lives according to the
Teaching, his reputation is bound to grow. 24
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: