Le 2023-02-10 15:01, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
DevRef §6.7.8.2 indicates that using such a suffix for *all* repacked origtgz is better.
Almost all our packages are repacked, that's pointless and brings no useful information. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.en.html#repackaged-upstream-source "may use packagename-upstream-version+dfsg (or any other suffix which is added to the tarball name) as the name of the top-level directory in its tarball. This makes it possible to distinguish pristine tarballs from repackaged ones." The 'may' requirement for the suffix is very weak. The Lintian repackaged-source-not-advertised warning should be downgraded to pedantic. Our time is limited, let's focus on important things. Emmanuel Bourg