debian-lint-maint Nov 2019 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Adam D. Barratt

• Bug#945544: lintian: Field too long doesn't report anything on the website Nov 27
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07

Andreas Beckmann

• Bug#941762: lintian in Stretch backports contains leftover from merge Nov 08
• Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348. Nov 01
• Bug#945299: lintian: ignores all but last override of a tag Nov 22
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 08
• Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348. Nov 01

Andreas Metzler

• Bug#943947: lintian: outdated build-profile list - noguile is registered, isn't it? Nov 01
• Bug#945869: lintian: false positive for debian-rules-not-executable Nov 30
• Bug#945869: lintian: false positive for debian-rules-not-executable Nov 30
• Bug#945869: lintian: false positive for debian-rules-not-executable Nov 30

Chirita Vasilica

• La ce _ Nov 03

Chris Lamb

• Re: Fix the location of the local html documentation Nov 10
• Bug#945867: lintian: Unable to override warning in -dbgsym Nov 30
• Bug#945544: lintian: Field too long doesn't report anything on the website Nov 27
• [Git][lintian/lintian][buster-backports] 62 commits: Open new changelog entry. Nov 03
• Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 06
• Bug#945030: lintian: legacy-foo++ test package fails with Nov 18
• Bug#944145: marked as pending in lintian Nov 18
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.33.0 Nov 04
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.35.0_bpo10+1 Nov 14
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.37.0 Nov 19
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.36.0_bpo10+1 Nov 18
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.32.0_bpo10+1 Nov 03
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.33.0_bpo9+1 Nov 07
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.35.0 Nov 12
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.37.0_bpo9+1 Nov 22
• Bug#945544: lintian: Field too long doesn't report anything on the website Nov 26
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.33.0_bpo10+1 Nov 07
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 10
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 14
• Bug#944707: lintian: check for missing and unsigned .buildinfo files Nov 14
• Bug#945276: lintian: broken pattern matching in debian/source/lintian-overrides Nov 22
• Bug#944462: lintian: Check for debhelper and the use of misc:Pre-Depends missing Nov 14
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.38.0 Nov 22
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.32.0_bpo9+1 Nov 03
• [Git][lintian/lintian][stretch-backports] 62 commits: Open new changelog entry. Nov 03
• [Git][lintian/lintian][stretch-backports] 46 commits: Open new changelog entry. Nov 07
• Bug#944707: lintian: check for missing and unsigned .buildinfo files Nov 15
• Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 06
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07
• Bug#944551: lintian: missing-python-build-dependency false positive Nov 12
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.36.0 Nov 15
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07
• Bug#944094: marked as pending in lintian Nov 05
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.34.0 Nov 07
• Bug#943525: lintian: Create private name spaces for tags Nov 21
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.35.0_bpo9+1 Nov 14
• Bug#945030: lintian: legacy-foo++ test package fails with Nov 20
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.36.0_bpo9+1 Nov 18
• Bug#942493: 5000 is a tad too small (was Re: lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields) Nov 11
• [Git][lintian/lintian] Pushed new tag 2.37.0_bpo10+1 Nov 22
• Bug#944551: lintian: missing-python-build-dependency false positive Nov 12
• Bug#942493: 5000 is a tad too small (was Re: lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields) Nov 12
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 10
• [Git][lintian/lintian][buster-backports] 46 commits: Open new changelog entry. Nov 07

Christoph Berg

• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 08
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 16
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 06
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07

Debian Bug Tracking System

• Processed: Bug#944145 marked as pending in lintian Nov 18
• Processed: Re: Bug#944707: lintian: check for missing and unsigned .buildinfo files Nov 14
• Processed: Re: Bug#944145: marked as pending in lintian Nov 18
• Processed: Re: lintian: legacy-foo++ test package fails with gzip: debian/foo++/usr/share/doc/foo++/changelog.gz already exists Nov 18
• Processed: Bug#944047 marked as pending in lintian Nov 10
• Processed: Re: Please check for update-rc.d "start" and "stop" argument usage Nov 02
• Processed: Bug#944145 marked as pending in lintian Nov 18
• Bug#944047: marked as done (lintian: warn against Build-Depends-Package: #PACKAGE# in symbol files) Nov 12
• Bug#944098: marked as done (lintian: changelog-file-missing-explicit-entry false positive for changelog with: 2, 2+deb10u1, 2+deb10u2) Nov 07
• Bug#945030: marked as done (lintian: legacy-foo++ test package fails with gzip: debian/foo++/usr/share/doc/foo++/changelog.gz already exists) Nov 18
• Bug#943910: marked as done (lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348.) Nov 07
• Processed: Bug#943947 marked as pending in lintian Nov 01
• Processed: Re: Bug#943913: lintian: processing packages with many manpages is very slow Nov 04
• Bug#943947: marked as done (lintian: outdated build-profile list - noguile is registered, isn't it?) Nov 04
• Processed: Re: Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 06
• Processed: Bug#944098 marked as pending in lintian Nov 06
• Processed: Bug#921136 marked as pending in lintian Nov 26
• Processed: Bug#944094 marked as pending in lintian Nov 04
• Processed: Bug#945276 marked as pending in lintian Nov 22
• Processed: Re: lintian: missing-python-build-dependency false positive Nov 15
• Processed: Bug#944807 marked as pending in lintian Nov 20
• Bug#943957: marked as done (lintian: missing-systemd-service-for-init.d-script should be a warning, not just pedantic) Nov 04
• Bug#944260: marked as done (lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends) Nov 11
• Processed: Re: lintian: Check for debhelper and the use of misc:Pre-Depends missing Nov 10
• Processed: Bug#943910 marked as pending in lintian Nov 06
• Processed: Bug#933304 marked as pending in lintian Nov 01
• Processed: Re: Bug#944094: marked as pending in lintian Nov 05
• Bug#942493: marked as done (lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields) Nov 12
• Bug#921136: marked as done (lintian: hardening-no-fortify-functions possible false positive) Nov 28
• Processed: Bug#944145 marked as pending in lintian Nov 18
• Processed: Re: Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 10
• Processed: Re: lintian: Check for debhelper and the use of misc:Pre-Depends missing Nov 14
• Processed: Bug#944895 marked as pending in lintian Nov 17
• Bug#945299: marked as done (lintian: ignores all but last override of a tag) Nov 22
• Processed: Bug#945299 marked as pending in lintian Nov 22
• Bug#943586: marked as done (lintian: confusing usage+internal+warning messages on binary packages) Nov 10
• Bug#933304: marked as done (lintian: suggest switching from debian/compat to debhelper-compat) Nov 04
• Bug#944145: marked as done (Please exclude .path/.timer & .service pairs from systemd-service-file-missing-install-key) Nov 19
• Bug#944807: marked as done (lintian: Order tags before printing) Nov 22
• Bug#944145: marked as done (Please exclude .path/.timer & .service pairs from systemd-service-file-missing-install-key) Nov 15
• Processed: Re: tool for ISA usage statistics within ELF binaries? Nov 04
• Bug#941762: marked as done (lintian in Stretch backports contains leftover from merge) Nov 05
• Bug#944094: marked as done (Please exclude .path & .service pairs from package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script) Nov 07
• Processed: Bug#944145 marked as pending in lintian Nov 18
• Bug#944258: marked as done (lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3) Nov 12
• Bug#944895: marked as done (lintian: missing-depends-on-sensible-utils triggers on package sensible-utils) Nov 19
• Processed: your mail Nov 18
• Processed: Re: please emit an error for python shebangs used in a package Nov 04
• Processed: Bug#944145 marked as pending in lintian Nov 15
• Bug#945276: marked as done (lintian: broken pattern matching in debian/source/lintian-overrides) Nov 22
• Processed: Re: Bug#945030: lintian: legacy-foo++ test package fails with Nov 18

Debian FTP Masters

• lintian_2.35.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy, stretch-backports Nov 16
• lintian_2.33.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports Nov 07
• lintian_2.37.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy, stretch-backports Nov 26
• lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports Nov 18
• lintian_2.36.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy, stretch-backports Nov 19
• Processing of lintian_2.38.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes Nov 28
• Processing of lintian_2.36.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes Nov 18
• Processing of lintian_2.32.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes Nov 03
• lintian_2.32.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy, stretch-backports Nov 05
• Processing of lintian_2.33.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes Nov 07
• lintian_2.34.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Nov 07
• Processing of lintian_2.38.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes Nov 28
• lintian_2.36.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy Nov 18
• lintian_2.35.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports Nov 14
• lintian_2.38.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports Nov 28
• Processing of lintian_2.35.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes Nov 14
• lintian_2.38.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Nov 22
• lintian_2.33.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy, stretch-backports Nov 16
• lintian_2.32.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports Nov 03
• lintian_2.37.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy Nov 22
• Processing of lintian_2.36.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes Nov 18
• lintian_2.38.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy Nov 28
• Processing of lintian_2.33.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes Nov 07
• Processing of lintian_2.32.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes Nov 03
• lintian_2.30.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy, stretch-backports Nov 05
• lintian_2.35.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Nov 12
• Processing of lintian_2.37.0_amd64.changes Nov 19
• lintian_2.36.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Nov 15
• Processing of lintian_2.38.0_amd64.changes Nov 22
• Processing of lintian_2.33.0_amd64.changes Nov 04
• Processing of lintian_2.35.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes Nov 14
• Processing of lintian_2.37.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes Nov 22
• Processing of lintian_2.39.0_amd64.changes Nov 28
• Processing of lintian_2.34.0_amd64.changes Nov 07
• lintian_2.37.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into buster-backports Nov 22
• lintian_2.35.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy Nov 14
• Processing of lintian_2.37.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes Nov 22
• Processing of lintian_2.36.0_amd64.changes Nov 15
• lintian_2.33.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Nov 04
• lintian_2.32.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy Nov 03
• lintian_2.33.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports->backports-policy Nov 07
• lintian_2.39.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Nov 28
• Processing of lintian_2.35.0_amd64.changes Nov 12
• lintian_2.37.0_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Nov 19

Dmitry Smirnov

• Bug#945867: lintian: Unable to override warning in -dbgsym Nov 30
• Bug#945867: lintian: Unable to override warning in -dbgsym Nov 30

Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY

• Fix the location of the local html documentation Nov 10

Felipe Sateler

• Bug#944895: lintian: missing-depends-on-sensible-utils triggers on package sensible-utils Nov 17

Felix Lechner

• Bug#945030: lintian: legacy-foo++ test package fails with Nov 18
• Bug#935907: lintian: Build only needed test packages on partial tests Nov 30
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 10
• Bug#945030: lintian: legacy-foo++ test package fails with Nov 19
• Bug#943913: lintian: processing packages with many manpages is very slow Nov 04
• [Git][lintian/lintian][master] 2 commits: In Lintian parts not involving checks, use new attribute accessors from Processable. Nov 19
• Bug#944047: lintian: warn against Build-Depends-Package: #PACKAGE# in symbol files Nov 04
• Bug#945276: lintian: ignores all but last override of a tag Nov 22
• Bug#944155: lintian: Version format vs source format mismatch tags disappeared Nov 05
• Bug#945869: lintian: false positive for debian-rules-not-executable Nov 30
• Bug#944047: lintian: warn against Build-Depends-Package: #PACKAGE# in symbol files Nov 04
• Bug#942493: lintian: Complain of too long header fields Nov 08
• Bug#943525: Namespaces for Lintian Tags Nov 20
• Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 07
• Bug#944047: lintian: warn against Build-Depends-Package: #PACKAGE# in symbol files Nov 08
• Bug#943724: lintian: internal error in Lintian::files::empty_package::_set_is_dummy Nov 02
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 06
• Bug#943913: lintian: processing packages with many manpages is very slow Nov 01
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07
• Bug#945030: Another prerequisite Nov 18
• Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348. Nov 01
• [Git][lintian/lintian][master] Add namespace::clean to all modules that use plain Moo and place those imports last. Nov 04
• Bug#944155: lintian: Version format vs source format mismatch tags disappeared Nov 06
• [Git][lintian/lintian][master] 2 commits: In Lintian parts not involving checks, replace references to outdated attribute 'info'. Nov 19
• Bug#944047: lintian: warn against Build-Depends-Package: #PACKAGE# in symbol files Nov 03
• Bug#944807: lintian: Order tags before printing Nov 15
• Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348. Nov 02
• [Git][lintian/lintian][master] 3 commits: In tests, set default to --pedantic. Nov 02
• Re: Format of test specifications Nov 10
• Bug#943910: lintian: FTBFS in stretch-bpo: Cannot parse line Argument "1/8" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at /build/lintian-2.31.0/lib/Lintian/Processable/Pool.pm line 348. Nov 01
• Bug#945869: lintian: false positive for debian-rules-not-executable Nov 30
• Bug#944258: lintian 2.32.0~bpo9+1 in stretch-backports depends on coreutils (>= 8.30), but stretch has only 8.26-3 Nov 07

Guillem Jover

• Bug#944155: lintian: Version format vs source format mismatch tags disappeared Nov 05
• Bug#944155: lintian: Version format vs source format mismatch tags disappeared Nov 06

Helmut Grohne

• Bug#943947: Bug#943905: gnutls28 FTCBFS during guile bindings Nov 01

Holger Levsen

• Bug#943957: lintian: missing-systemd-service-for-init.d-script should be a warning, not just pedantic Nov 01

Jonas Smedegaard

• Bug#943525: Namespaces for Lintian Tags Nov 20

Martin Pitt

• Bug#945276: lintian: broken pattern matching in debian/source/lintian-overrides Nov 22

mary botan de vargas

• Y ży Nov 23

Matthias Klose

• Bug#944113: please emit an error for python shebangs used in a package Nov 04

Mattia Rizzolo

• Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 10
• Bug#944462: lintian: Check for debhelper and the use of misc:Pre-Depends missing Nov 10

Michael Biebl

• Bug#944098: lintian: changelog-file-missing-explicit-entry false positive for changelog with: 2, 2+deb10u1, 2+deb10u2 Nov 06
• Bug#942493: lintian: Complain of too long header fields Nov 08
• Bug#942493: lintian: Complain of too long header fields Nov 09

Paul Wise

• Bug#717595: Please check for update-rc.d "start" and "stop" argument usage Nov 02

Raphael Hertzog

• Bug#943525: Namespaces for Lintian Tags Nov 22

Richard Laager

• Bug#944145: marked as pending in lintian Nov 18
• Bug#944094: Please exclude .path & .service pairs from package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script Nov 04
• Bug#944094: marked as pending in lintian Nov 05

Russ Allbery

• Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 07

Sean Whitton

• Bug#943525: Namespaces for Lintian Tags Nov 20

Sebastian Ramacher

• Bug#944047: lintian: warn against Build-Depends-Package: #PACKAGE# in symbol files Nov 03
• Bug#944047: lintian: warn against Build-Depends-Package: #PACKAGE# in symbol files Nov 03

Shengjing Zhu

• Bug#944089: tool for ISA usage statistics within ELF binaries? Nov 04

Simon McVittie

• Bug#945891: lintian: please update list of DEB_BUILD_PROFILES Nov 30
• Bug#944098: lintian: changelog-file-missing-explicit-entry false positive for changelog with: 2, 2+deb10u1, 2+deb10u2 Nov 04

Sven Geuer

• Bug#944462: lintian: Check for debhelper and the use of misc:Pre-Depends missing Nov 10

Sven Joachim

• Bug#943913: lintian: processing packages with many manpages is very slow Nov 01
• Bug#943913: lintian: processing packages with many manpages is very slow Nov 04
• Bug#943913: lintian: processing packages with many manpages is very slow Nov 04

Sylvestre Ledru

• Bug#945544: lintian: Field too long doesn't report anything on the website Nov 27
• Bug#945544: lintian: Field too long doesn't report anything on the website Nov 26

Thomas Ward

• Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 06
• Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 06
• Bug#944260: lintian: Add a detection/tag for when compat is >> 10 and cdbs in build-depends Nov 06

Thorsten Glaser

• Bug#942493: 5000 is a tad too small (was Re: lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields) Nov 12
• Bug#944551: lintian: missing-python-build-dependency false positive Nov 12
• Bug#944551: lintian: missing-python-build-dependency false positive Nov 11
• Bug#942493: 5000 is a tad too small (was Re: lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields) Nov 11
• Bug#942493: 5000 is a tad too small (was Re: lintian: Please warn about overly-long header fields) Nov 10

Vagrant Cascadian

• Bug#944707: lintian: check for missing and unsigned .buildinfo files Nov 14
• Bug#944707: lintian: check for missing and unsigned .buildinfo files Nov 14

Wouter Verhelst

• Bug#943525: Namespaces for Lintian Tags Nov 21

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]