debian-policy May 2012 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Request for policy interpretation: procedure and possible outcomes for naming conflicts
Bug#291148: Proposal
Bug#299007: Group staff in /usr/local: Moving forward
Bug#541956: Fw: t-p-u description in dev-ref
Bug#591791: [PATCH] Document generic and upstart-specific init-system requirements
Re: Bug#608719: Debian Policy about administrator X.509 certificate stores [was: Re: dovecot-common: please do not use /etc/ssl/certs for end-entity X.509 certificates (/etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem)]
Bug#654958: debian-policy: Document VCS fields.
Bug#662649: base-files: Request inclusion of Creative Commons licenses in /usr/share/common-licenses
Bug#671009: debian-policy: does not mention debtags
Bug#671120: debian-policy: suggest delegating binary name conflicts to tech-ctte in last resort
Bug#671355: debian-policy: [debconf_spec] Document escape capability.
Bug#671503: APT repository format is not documented
Bug#671503: general: APT repository format is not documented
Bug#671507: debian-policy: policy section 7.4 conflicts with section 10.1
Bug#671705: Sect 4.8: add reference to debian-experimental-changes
Bug#672198: [developers-reference] NMU clarification for section 5.11.1
E' arrivato
Processed: debian-policy is the place to discuss this
Processed: downgrading
Processed: Re: Bug#671503: general: APT repository format is not documented
Re: Request for policy interpretation: procedure and possible outcomes for naming conflicts
Request for policy interpretation: procedure and possible outcomes for naming conflicts
The last update was on 14:21 GMT Sun Aug 20. There are 42 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc
