Re: Mutt & Mail-Followup-To header (Re: old bugs info)
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 11:24:46PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hmm, should the header be just "Reply-To:", as defined in RFC 822? The
> "Mail-Followup-To" headers seems to me like some bastard brother of the
> usenet "Followup-To:" header (as defined in RFC 1036).
> So could this be a bug in mutt?
There used to be a draft (draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-01) which tried
propose this field. At the moment, it seems to disappear.
--
Misha
Reply to: