Re: Volume on -devel
Branden Robinson wrote:
> Still, though, it would be nice to have some kind of motivational tool for
> moving people towards digital signatures on Debian mail. Once GPG hits
> 1.0, and it has been audited to my paranoid satisfaction, I'll get a lot
> louder about this. I think it's really important. Many people complain
> that their mailers don't make it convenient for them to sign messages, or
> their MUA's don't grok RFC 2015 (PGP/MIME). But those are bugs in the
> mailers, not in my proposal.
I agree with John, there's really no reason to sign every random opinion
posted to -devel.
I haven't signed this. It's not an important message. If someone happened to
spoof this message, I'd certianly notice it, and sign a retration. What
would signing this message gain me?
--
see shy jo
Reply to: