* This platform is very similar to my previous platforms with some additions and deletions.
Who am I?
I am a librarian turned Free Software enthusiast and Debian Developer from India.
Some of my activities in Debian are:
•ruby, javascript, golang and font packages (totalling to around 200) since 2016. (not very active nowadays)
•Community Team delegate Aug 2020 – Jul 2025
•Application Manager since Jul 2020
•Outreach team since Aug/Sep 2020
•Chief orga DebConf India 2023
•DebConf Committee member since 2023
I have been mentoring people to contribute to Debian for many years now. I am involved in organizing numerous packaging workshops and other Debian events throughout India. I am also involved in organizing other free software events like Free Software Camp.
Why am I contesting?
Initially, in 2020, when I first contested for DPL, my only concern was to bring Diversity conversation to the limelight. But this year, in addition to the diversity concern, I am concerned about reluctance among Debian Developers to volunteer for DPL position. Since 2020, I have had the “hectic life of a DPL and the burnout that follows” conversation with some of the previous DPLs. With less and less DDs coming forward to contest for DPL, I want to dedicate some of my time to make things easier for the future DPLs. Now I cannot promise what I will do with respect to this concern, but I will explore possibilities including a DPL administrative assistance team, more delegated teams etc.
With respect to Diversity, I still stand by my what I said in my previous platforms.
“How many times did we have a non-(cis)male candidate for DPL? If I am not wrong, when I contested in 2020, I was the second non-(cis)male DPL candidate till date.
I am aware that Debian is doing things to increase diversity within Debian, but as we can see, it is not sufficient. I am sad that there are only two women Debian Developer from a large country like India. I believe diversity is not something to be discussed only within Debian-women or Debian-diversity. It should come up for discussion in each and every aspect of the project.
DPL elections is an important activity in our project and I plan to bring up the topic of diversity for discussion every election till we have a non-(cis)male DPL.
I feel that one effective way to encourage diverse people to contribute is to have more visibility for diversity already within the community. As more and more women (both cis and trans), trans men, and genderqueer people who are already part of the project become more visible instead of staying hidden in some part of the project, more gender diverse people will feel comfortable joining our community. Geographic/ethnic diversity are also important areas which need attention.”
What are my plans as DPL
1. Administrative
DPL helpers (DPL committee? DPL administrative assistance team?)
I have heard from the previous DPLs that the workload is too huge to be completed by a single person. During my last round of contesting, someone suggested the concept of having helpers for DPL. I agree with the thought process and I intend to have 1-2 people to do some work that can be offloaded from the DPL workload. This would help in reducing revert time and increasing efficiency.
2. Diversity
Diversity budget
In-spite of spending a good amount of money on diversity, we seem to not get the expected outcome. As DPL, I would be to revisiting the existing spending pattern to analyse why and where we are going wrong. When I say we should focus on diversity, I do not mean that we should blindly spend money in the name of diversity. I am personally aware of instances where the diversity budget expenditure did bad instead of any good.
Another thing I would focus with respect to the diversity budget is to publicise it more so that people who deserve it get to know about it so that we do not end up spending it just for the sake of spending.
Diversity activities
I have heard that Debian-women project did some incredible work in improving women contributors till it went dormant. Now we have the Debian-diversity initiative, but this hasn’t gained much momentum yet. I plan to streamline their activities and if possible have a delegated team focusing on diversity. The delegated team shall co-ordinate all the diversity related activities in Debian. This team will also be involved in the decisions and expenditure of the diversity budget.
Local activities
Debian-localgroups which was conceptualised by Jonathan Carter during his DPL tenure, is a great idea to promote geographical diversity. I plan to use the potential of localgroups to organize more local events and have more diverse people contribute to Debian.
3. Outreach
I have been working with the Debian-outreach team for some years now. I feel outreach is one important activity which often does not get its due importance. Our outreach team end up being just co-ordinators for GSoC and Outreachy. I have a couple of ideas planned out for outreach.
Debian camp
Debian camp is a concept that I borrowed from Free Software Camp for which I was one of the core organizers. Basically the concept is to have 3-4 months long online mentorship program. The advantage of a Debian specific mentorship program is that we can tailor the program according to our specific needs.
There will be two parts for the program. In the first part, the primary focus will be on the philosophy of Debian (and free software) and why one should contribute to Debian etc. We can have common sessions on these topics for the mentees. In the second part, the mentees will work with mentors on the projects of their choice.
In this activity, I plan to have the Debian-outreach team as the co-ordinators/facilitators who work in collaboration with Debian-diversity, Debian-localgroups, Debian Academy etc. The Debian-outreach team will be doing the back-end activities of organizing, scheduling etc. while other teams will be helping out with resource persons/mentors/projects etc. I specifically intend to have Debian-localgroups involved so that we can have localised activities and not just in English.
The question of whether to pay stipend or not could be discussed later and decided (we did not have stipend for the Free Software Camp and still it was a success).
Review of current activities
A thorough review of current outreach activities is long overdue. We need to examine the effectiveness of our GSoC and Outreachy participations, what we can do better and what we can do new.
4. Community
Debian community is a great community. But that does not mean we are perfect. Some points I would be interested to take up as DPL are:
Welcoming
Even when we say we are a welcoming community, for an outsider it might not appear so. There are a lot of reasons for this. The main reason being that online communication often leads to miscommunication and unintended flame wars. As a community, we need to work towards making Debian more welcoming to all – new comers and old timers alike. I am very keen on facilitating discussions on this as a DPL.
Change embracing
It is often observed that Debian as a community is reluctant to change most of the time. As a DPL, I would like to develop a culture of embracing change. I would encourage and facilitate people proposing new ideas and processes for improvement of Debian.
5. Debian as an organisation
Debian Foundation (?)
In some of the previous years’ DPL campaigns, having Debian as a registered organisation has come up. While organising DebConf23, I had to face some issues because Debian is not a registered organisation, that is when I started thinking about this concept seriously.
So, as a DPL, I would be definitely interested in exploring the possibilities, advantages and disadvantages of having Debian registered. This is not one of my main agenda, but it will definitely be brought up if I am elected.
Trusted organisations
As one of the main responsibilities of DPL is financial management, I would like to revisit our relationship with the existing trusted organisations, fund management procedure and if needed, explore the possibilities of having more TOs to reduce dependency on one or two.
