debian-policy Dec 1999 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Adam Di Carlo

Re: base dependency warning Dec 21
Re: base dependency warning Dec 21

Andrew Pimlott

Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 13
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 14

Anthony Towns

Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 12
Re: weekly policy summary Dec 08
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Bug#46522: weekly policy summary Dec 08
Re: weekly policy summary Dec 08
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 12
Re: copyright file problems Dec 04
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Bug#42554: weekly policy summary Dec 08
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 09
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 10
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 03
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 04
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 03
Re: weekly policy summary Dec 08
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 08
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 09

Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho

Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Re: Bug#53054: pygresql: change version number to reflect correct upstream version Dec 19

Ben Collins

Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information. Dec 03
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 13
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 13
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 12
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 13
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 13

Ben Harris

Bug#53700: bogosity in editor/pager discussion Dec 29

Bob Hilliard

Re: Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 07
Bug#42554: weekly policy summary Dec 08

Branden Robinson

Bug#53755: [PROPOSED] policy for usage of "xserver" alternative Dec 31
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Bug#53755: PROPOSED] policy for usage of "xserver" alternative Dec 31
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 03
Bug#53758: [PROPOSED] Policy for "x-window-manager" virtual package and alternative Dec 31
Bug#53757: PROPOSED] policy for "x-terminal-emulator" virtual package and alternative Dec 31
Bug#53760: [PROPOSED] revision of X application-defaults policy Dec 31
Re: weekly policy summary Dec 04
Bug#53757: [PROPOSED] policy for "x-terminal-emulator" virtual package and alternative Dec 31
Bug#53761: [PROPOSED] revision of the Motif/LessTif policy Dec 31
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location] Dec 15
Re: Bug#51879: revised proposal: package may be maintained by a group Dec 08
Bug#53759: [PROPOSED] revision of the "to build with X support or not" policy Dec 31
Bug#53756: [PROPOSED] additions to virtual package list Dec 31
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 04
Bug#53762: [PROPOSED] applying the FHS to packages that use X Dec 31
Bug#53763: [PROPOSED] policy for X font packages Dec 31

Brian May

Re: ICCCM compliance? Dec 03
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 04

Bruce Perens

Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement Dec 04

Chris Waters

Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 09
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement Dec 05
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 10
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 12
Re: [nathan@dnase.hpw.pri.bms.com (Nathan O. Siemers)] Humble Request Re: New release over due Dec 04
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 03
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 12
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 11
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?) Dec 02
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 11
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01

Daniel Quinlan

liblockdev Dec 01

Darren

RE: Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 14

Darren Benham

Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 14

Darren O. Benham

Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?) Dec 02
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?) Dec 02

debian-policy

CVS jdg: Add "and others" to author of packaging manual. Dec 22

Edward Betts

Package without build-deps (was: Installed hello 1.3-16) Dec 04
Move TeX from Standard (was: a nitpicky reading of policy) Dec 03

Fabrizio Polacco

Re: liblockdev Dec 01

Falk Hueffner

Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 03

Franklin Belew

Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 07
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 14

Gergely Madarasz

Re: Bug#53054: pygresql: change version number to reflect correct upstream version Dec 19
copyright file problems Dec 03
Re: webmin license Dec 17

Greg Stark

Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation Dec 19

Henning Makholm

Re: webmin license Dec 20

Ivan Baldo

Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information. Dec 03
Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information. Dec 03

James Deikun

Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01

Jason Gunthorpe

Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 14
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 09
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 08
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 12
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 09
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 08

Joel Klecker

Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 20
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 04

Joey Hess

Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 04
weekly policy summary Dec 11
Re: recommends/suggests patch Dec 14
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 04
Bug#51879: revised proposal: package may be maintained by a group Dec 08
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?) Dec 02
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 07
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement Dec 07
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Re: weekly policy summary Dec 06
Bug#42554: weekly policy summary Dec 10
Bug#51879: revised proposal: package may be maintained by a group Dec 07
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement Dec 06
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 06
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement Dec 04
a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 02
weekly policy summary Dec 04
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Re: base dependency warning Dec 21
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?) Dec 02
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?) Dec 04
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement Dec 04
Re: base dependency warning Dec 20
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: Submitting bugs ? (Was: Getting rid of section "base" ?) Dec 02
Re: base dependency warning Dec 21

John Galt

Re: webmin license Dec 17

John Lines

Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove referenc es to non-free from main Dec 01

Joseph Carter

Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 08
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: base dependency warning Dec 20
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove referenc es to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 08
Re: base dependency warning Dec 21
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 08
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 08
Re: weekly policy summary Dec 08

Josip Rodin

Bug#53496: some details wrong in Policy section 3.2. Dec 25

Julian Gilbey

Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information. Dec 04
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 13
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 03
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: base dependency warning Dec 21
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 14
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Bug#52225: policy typo Dec 08
Bug#51832: packaging-manual: Architecture setting: more information. Dec 03
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 14
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location] Dec 14
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 03
Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II) Dec 13
CVS commit messages Dec 22
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 14
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 15

Karl M. Hegbloom

Manoj Srivastava

Mark Baker

Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 07

Martin Schulze

Bug#53755: PROPOSED] policy for usage of "xserver" alternative Dec 31
Bug#53757: PROPOSED] policy for "x-terminal-emulator" virtual package and alternative Dec 31

Michael Alan Dorman

Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation Dec 19

Michael Jennings

Re: ICCCM compliance? Dec 03

Moray Allan

Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy Dec 01

Nathan O. Siemers

Nils Jeppe

Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 03

Oliver Elphick

Peter Naulls

Bug#52225: policy typo Dec 08

Peter S Galbraith

Re: Redundant code for non-us? Dec 03
Re: copyright file problems Dec 03

Raul Miller

Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 03
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 03
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 09
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 03
Bug#46522: weekly policy summary Dec 08
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 03
Re: Shared libs in non-standard locations Dec 19
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 03
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 03
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 03
Bug#52225: policy typo Dec 08
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 09
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 03
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 03

Richard Braakman

Re: recommends/suggests patch Dec 15

Ronald van Loon

RE: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove referenc es to non-free from main Dec 01

Sean 'Shaleh' Perry

Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 04
Re: ICCCM compliance? Dec 03

Seth R Arnold

Re: [nathan@dnase.hpw.pri.bms.com (Nathan O. Siemers)] Humble Request Re: New release over due Dec 05
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes Dec 10

Taketoshi Sano

Re: base dependency warning Dec 21
Re: base dependency warning Dec 21

Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 02
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 07

Tomasz Wegrzanowski

Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 04
Re: Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement Dec 04
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 04
Re: The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 08
Bug#53761: PROPOSED] revision of the Motif/LessTif policy Dec 31
Bug#51842: [PROPOSED] closing hole in DFSG that can force you to include some text in advertisement Dec 03
Re: copyright file problems Dec 04
Re: a nitpicky reading of policy Dec 04
The end of GIF format [was : Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL ] Dec 03
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main Dec 01
Re: copyright file problems Dec 04

Wichert Akkerman

Bug#53405: packaging-manual: dpkg 1.6.5 will reorder symlinks for you Dec 24

Yann Dirson

Re: base dependency warning Dec 20

Zed Pobre

Re: Package without build-deps (was: Installed hello 1.3-16) Dec 05
Bug#51879: revised proposal: package may be maintained by a group Dec 07
Bug#51879: PROPOSAL: package may be maintained by a group Dec 07

The last update was on 08:01 GMT Sat May 11. There are 259 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc